There are excellent web sites on Solar System: National Geographic is a site with an
excellent off scale illustration. NASA has a very rich site reachable and downloadable via links. At the heart of the solar system is the Sun. The nearest four planets are rocky, terrestrial worlds — Mercury,
Venus, Earth and Mars. After these are gas giants — Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. Between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter is the asteroid belt, with the
dwarf planet Ceres. Beyond the orbit of Neptune one finds the disk-shaped Kuiper belt, in which dwarf planet Pluto resides, and far beyond that is the giant, spherical Oort
Cloud and the teardrop-shaped heliopause.
To explain the formation of the Solar System the Nebular Model is widely accepted. Solar Nebula was a giant, rotating cloud of gas and dust,
collapsed because of its gravity etc. But concentration of oxygen isotopes cast shadow on this theory.
The sun is by far the largest object in the solar system; it is almost all of the solar system. It contains more
than 99.8% of the total mass of the Solar System.
Its density is 1.41 g/cm3. The planets and dwarfs have respectively 5.4 , 5.2 5.5 , 3.9 , (Ceres : 2.8) , 1.33 , 0.687 ,
1.27 , 1.64 , (Pluto : 2.03) g/cm3. This already forces me to question if the first 4 are solar.
Between inner and outer 4 planets there is an asteroid belt. In trans-neptunian region we see Kuiper Belt. At about 50
thousands AU speech is made of Oort cloud. Our atmosphere, Van Allen Belt, asteroid belt, Kuiper Belt and Oort cloud may well be considered to be protecting shields considering
Our Sun resides in one of the Milky Way's outer spiral arms, known as the Orion Arm or Local Spur. The Sun lies between
25,000 and 28,000 light years from the Galactic Centre, and its speed within the galaxy is about 220 kilometres per second, so that it completes one revolution every 225–250
I had difficulties in making a selection of Sun's properties. Due to 2 reasons:
1- I thought they are common knowledge.
2- In reality I share with Goethe "Von Sonne und Mond habe ich nicts zu sagen; ich sehe nur wie sich die Menschen
pflagen." (I have nothing to say about Sun and the Moon; I see only the self torture of humans).
The question Goethe has probably asked himself and we have to ask ourselves if we are on the right way or if are are
being somehow cheated. This gains every day weight.
Said in another way the question is if the Holy Books are (at the least partly) right or will our science be able to
pull us out of every difficulty we encounter.
I am no expert in religious matters. I have read the Old and the
New Testaments once and only carelessly. The Quran I have read and continue to read, trying to understand. They seem
to be very similar.
If Orion is the Heavens mentioned in Holy Books, the measures given in Quran matches with our measurements. The Quran
explains the difference of the Sun and the Moon in verse 71/16. This verse and some similar ones were responsible for nonimitability of the Quran as it was being revealed.
The style could easily be imitable.
It has the following verses regarding the evolution of the things on Earth (79/28 to 79/32):
1- Raised, gathered together and proportioned .
2- Darkened its night and extracted its brightness.
3- Spread the earth.
4- Extracted from it its water and its pasture.
5- The mountains He set firmly.
It is to be noted that the chronological orders are compatible.
The first verse gives the impression that Earth is detached from a star like object, not necessarily the Sun.
The verse 21/30 seems to support the second; it further says that every living creature is created from water. The phrase "every living thing" discloses the trivial
To persuade the hard believers we still need "differential diagnosis".
Since the Quran contains a good amount of verses that are hard to understand or even to be evaluated as senseless, it is pretty hard to find the differential. We will try the
1- The existence of the spirit.
2- The evolution of the things in the near future.
A possible way of persuasion would be to prove the existence of the spirit. Many trials have been done in the past but none was persuasive.
Masonic initiation is accepted to make the spirit more sensitive to the outer universe. It is an old art which has not been studied by academia and it
may be time to open it to academia.
It seems to work, at the least by some of the initiated it works and understanding why and how it works may give clues. I would very much like to learn
the gears and the wheels for the sake of my own curiousity.
I have been a good mason without apron all of my life, without being a registered one because I have been adviced to do so by registered masons .
The Quran says in verse 70/4 that the angels and the spirit has 1/50 ths of the velocity of light. Though matter may
also be nonlinear in small scale, we may understand from this verse that the spirit is no light and no matter.
It might be a possibility of arriving the persuasive findings to study nonlinear phenomena and solitons with these in mind .
To try to understand the e.m. interactions within the brain under the scope of any possible result.
THE DEVELOPEMENT of the EVENTS
The developement of the event seems to be in the direction predicted by the Holy Books but not persuasive.
It may get more persuasive in the near future.
The image left is clickable. The location and cast seems to have some similarities with the story given in the verses 18/92 through 18/99. If
there emerges something as predicted from the location detected, that will certainly be more persuasive.
We may choose to be proactive and to search for the possible developments and decide in advance.
The comparison of all the events and predicted happeninigs, an integrated comparison may give also clues. This we will try in the